W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > April 2004

Re: EARL Testcase

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:52:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Cc: Shadi Abou-Zahra <shadi@w3.org>, 'WAI ER IG List' <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0404151846110.32709@homer.w3.org>

The OWL example I posted to WCAG shows how to do the binding using
off-the-shelf standards instead of inventing stuff for EARL -
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-gl/2004AprJun/0025 (the code
example at step 2 which is avaialble on its own as

It runs out that testId is not in the schema, although it is used in an
example in the spec draft. I regarded this as a reason not to use it. And I
think that it is better to use pure OWL than to write special terms in EARL
that a processor needs to understand before it can do anything useful.



On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Chris Ridpath wrote:

>Yes, we need the binding.
>Can you suggest a method of binding the tool specific test to the standard
>test suite?
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2004 18:52:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:35 UTC