W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > December 2003

Updated Re: URI for Re: EARL for non-experts

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 01:08:14 -0500 (EST)
To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
Cc: WAI ER IG List <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0312101614540.26387@homer.w3.org>

>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/Europe/talks/200311-earl/all.htm

On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Chris Ridpath wrote:

>Very helpful!
>
>I really need a description for 'describing the error'.

Do you mean what I have called "locating the error"? I ahven't done that yet.
It's tricky... which I guess is why it is an open issue <grin/>.

I'll add some stuff, and discuss it here in parallel.

>When describing an image, we use the image filename. A problem with this
>approach is that all images with the same filename are treated the same. If
>the author states that image flower.gif does not require a long description
>then we assume that another instance of flower.gif in the same file does not
>require a long description.

This is a question we have looked at in the development of WAINu - being able
to keep the context of an image use is important, as is being able to handle
multiple alt values. LIFT goes some way there in categorising image types -
for a spacer gif there is basically no need to track context, for others
there may be, and others might be icons, where consistent context is itself a
checkpoint requirement.

cheers

Chaals
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 01:12:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:42 GMT