Re: XML Validation EARL update

Hi Nick,

> I've tinkered a little more with it since our earlier discussion.

In the current Valet output, the following:-

<earl:validity
   rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#fails"/>

should be:-

<earl:validity
   rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/1.0-test#Fail"/>

Apart from that, it seems alright: good work.

> I have implemented Jim's suggestion of accepting
> Content-Location as an identifier.

What's all this about using Content-Location? I'm not sure what you mean,
but note that "Content-Location" simply points to a resource whose
associated representations are the same as the subject resource. It does
not mean that the resources are equivalent, necessarily, from the Semantic
Web/RDF point of view. It one of those points that could only ever get
raised on an RDF list, though.

--
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> .
:Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .