The scenario: I used ATR 0.5 to review A-Prompt, and exported as EARL. After applying a filter to convert to [a developmental] EARL 1.0, and some hand tweaking, I then produced a mock report from the next day, this time indicating that a broken feature had been fixed. The job of the query is to filter out the update. In other words, I have a bit of EARL with lots of evaluations against various test cases. In the first report, I have an assertion that says "tool x *failed* test case y on date z", and in the second report, I have an assertion which says "tool x *passed* test case y on date z+1". The command line:- cwm a.n3 b.n3 --filter=filter.n3 > out.n3 All files are attached. The output was:- [[[ [ <filter.n3#fixed> [ <filter.n3#betweenDates> ( "2002-01-28" "2002-01-29" ); <filter.n3#withRespectToTest> <http://www.aprompt.ca/testfiles/#1-1-1-f4> ]; earl:documentation <http://www.aprompt.ca/> ]. ]]] - out.n3 Limitation: doesn't check for assertor information. a.n3 was produced with ATR, and is an actual evaluation of A-Prompt. b.n3, however, is fake, and derived from a.n3. Note that assertor information is left out of b.n3. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://purl.org/net/swn#> . :Sean :homepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:40 GMT