W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > February 2002

Re: EARL Semantics and Queryability [was: Re: EARL-producing testing tool]

From: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:09:53 +0000 (GMT)
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
cc: Nadia Heninger <nadia@barbwired.com>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20020216000616.W705-100000@fenris.webthing.com>
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Jim Ley wrote:

> >I'd rather save information in some kind of EARL database
>
> Well now you can...
>
> If you POST your earl to http://jibbering.com/earldb/v.1 it will store it
> in a database (returns 500 status on error, or echos your RDF back to you

Is that an HTTP POST with a text/xml or rdf COntent-Type?  If so, PUT
might perhaps be more appropriste.

Or is it a conventional Form submission with the EARL URL- or multipart-
encoded as Form data?


-- 
Nick Kew

Site Valet - the mark of Quality on the Web.
<URL:http://valet.webthing.com/>
Received on Friday, 15 February 2002 19:10:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:40 GMT