W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > February 2002


From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 07:07:57 -0500 (EST)
To: Nick Kew <nick@webthing.com>
cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0202010705060.28396-100000@tux.w3.org>
Well, the benefit of XHTML+EARL is that it could provide a simple solution
for the authoring phase. But I think it is not a really smart solution, and
what we want is to provide a pointer to metadata (unfortunately XHTML so far
isn't too smart about being able to do this).

But that is really a question of how you deal with the output of the earl
process - it must be relatively simple to instead pipe it somewhere else.


On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Nick Kew wrote:

  The approach here is to embed the RDF in the <head> of an XHTML doc.
  The RDF is sort-of based on some of Sean's examples, but I'm not
  currently in a fit state to work out if it makes sense (it
  probably doesn't).

  So my questions:
    (1) Is this basic XHTML+EARL type of approach any use to anyone?
    (3) Where next?
Received on Friday, 1 February 2002 07:08:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:33 UTC