- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 23:44:46 -0500 (EST)
- To: asgilman@iamdigex.net (Al Gilman)
- Cc: jcowan@reutershealth.com (John Cowan), wendy@w3.org (Wendy A Chisholm), w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Al Gilman scripsit: > The resolution is that the place and local time is sufficent as a policy for > how to rendezvous, and it is a rendezvous policy that is what goes in a > plan, *not* necessarily an _unambiguous_ *time* reference. True. But as a surrogate for the place, the ADO time zone may well serve, because it is a spatial unit that has had the same time offset history since the epoch (1970-01-01); furthermore, it in no case crosses national boundaries. > The offset > policy of the civil authority will be definitized in time to accomplish the > rendezvous transaction of both being at the agreed meeting point at the same > time. Indeed. -- "In my last lifetime, John Cowan I believed in reincarnation; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan in this lifetime, jcowan@reutershealth.com I don't." --Thiagi http://www.reutershealth.com
Received on Thursday, 19 December 2002 23:45:55 UTC