R.I.P.

My understanding is that this group will become a "mail drop" wherein ideas 
for Evaluation and Repair tools are forwarded to the appropriate Working 
Groups - specifically Authoring Tools, Content (at least for a while ;->) 
), and mostly Quality Assurance. The latter is actually hoped to be 
W3C-wide and not just for Accessibility-type tools.

If this is a reasonably accurate assessment, it might behoove us to have an 
agenda for Wednesday's F2F that reflects that.

I propose a "call for tools" which essentially gathers a compendium of wish 
lists that will provide for enablement of various W3C undertakings - much 
like what is intended by RDF-IG and SW groups. Whenever something like 
XPath appears there seems to be a need for, e.g. a geek-to-English 
translation so that somebody besides the WG members can figure out what's 
up and "but how do I use XLink/XForms/RDF on my Website?"

I have to build a pen from my soon-to-arrive Alpacas, but I'll still be 
able to answer the voluminous responses to this proposal.


--
Love.
EACH UN-INDEXED/ANNOTATED WEB POSTING WE MAKE IS TESTAMENT TO OUR HYPOCRISY

Received on Saturday, 29 September 2001 10:20:01 UTC