At 09:16 AM 2001-09-19 , Daniel Dardailler wrote: > >Only 6 people registered so far. > >I'd like to know, in light of the recent events, if more people are >expected to come, or less. > >Since it's a joint PF/ER meeting, I'm sending that to both list. > AG:: IIRC William has had less than glowing experiences with remote participation in past meetings. If you would consider youself a candidate for remote participation [not guaranteed] in this meeting, please respond to this message with some brief remarks in as many of the following six starred question categories as you can manage: * What part of the meeting would you be hoping to participate in? * What squeaks: If past attempts were not so hot, summarize defects. * What works: What seemed to work the best and how well did it work? * Blue sky: In the best of all possible worlds, how would it work [limit, ten pages] * Baby steps: Well, if we at least did this it would be better * What to do: Your best guess of the least risk/pain way to enable real participation from remote. For you. -- Thanks, AlReceived on Wednesday, 19 September 2001 12:05:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:39 GMT