- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 06:32:18 -0500 (EST)
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- cc: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Hey this is quite cool. I think that there are a few ways you could clean it up... One is to remove all the syntax stuff to linked examples for people who are interested, and just have the prose description stuff (which is very cool) in the main page. It would also be good for the group to formally agree that the canonical syntax is XML RDF, or to formally agree that there are two syntaxes and a defined conversion algorithm, or whatever. And the other thing is for us to do more work on looking at existing implementations and how to make something of them, and to collect the information we have about them. Cheers Charles On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Sean B. Palmer wrote: Attached as <<1.0spec.html>>. In researching for this specification, I came to the conclusion that our current documentation is really poor (which admittedly is mainly my fault for not documenting what I was doing). Relying on people to work out EARL from the RDF Schema was not a good idea :-) Hopefully, the attached specification will start to make up for that. Feedback and comments are most welcome. Cheers, -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . :Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> . -- Charles McCathieNevile http://www.w3.org/People/Charles phone: +61 409 134 136 W3C Web Accessibility Initiative http://www.w3.org/WAI fax: +1 617 258 5999 Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia (or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 06:33:43 UTC