W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > July 2001

Re: WART implementation plan

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
cc: WAI ER group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107021910140.9052-100000@tux.w3.org>
Cool. I think that we should look seriously at generating annotea annotations
for pages as an option. As I understand it, for a given page we would do a
POST to an Annotea server of the EARL that we have.

Ther is more information at the Annotea protocols page
http://www.w3.org/2001/Annotea/User/Protocol but my rough summary is you post
something like the following:

POST /annot HTTP/1.1
Host: annotea.example.org
Content-Type: application/xml
Content-Length: 1082

<r:RDF xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
  <r:type resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotation-ns#Annotation"/>
  <r:type resource="http://www.w3.org/2000/10/annotationType#EARL"/>   <!-- if they made that an annotation type... -->
  <a:annotates r:resource="http://example.com/some/page.html"/>
  <d:creator>Ralph Swick</d:creator>
     <h:ContentType>text/rdf+xml</h:ContentType> <!-- or whatever it is -->
     <h:Body r:parseType="Literal">
   <earl xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/0.95#">
     <!-- and so on for an earl statement of the right length  -->
     <!-- how does the dc:creeator interact with earl:asserts? -->

(Should check that with an annotea wizard)

You can then query the server for annotations and see what other people said,
or compare, or ... (all it needs is some user interface wizardry <grin/>)


On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
  Regardless, I have created a plan page for it with a lovely photo of a wart
  hog at: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/WART/plan.html
Received on Monday, 2 July 2001 19:25:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:32 UTC