W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2001

Re: Equivalent Sites: What It Means

From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 08:27:38 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010126081940.022c74a0@localhost>
To: Kynn Bartlett <kynn@idyllmtn.com>
Cc: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>, William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>, Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
At 01:56 PM 1/25/2001 -0800, Kynn Bartlett wrote:
>At 01:35 PM 1/25/2001 , Marja-Riitta Koivunen wrote:
> >Also one important thing to me has been that the information used by
> >alternative views to a site gets updated at the same time with the same
> >process so that there is no danger of  one alternative lagging behind and
> >the other alternative becoming the 'main' one.
>
>That is the same as "the same content."

Maybe, at least at one point of time and probably with good intensions to 
also keep it so. However, when we are trying to find a definition I would 
like to emphasis the updating point of view.

Marja

> > >  (2) The same content is conveyed through each interface.
>
>--Kynn
>
>--
>Kynn Bartlett  <kynn@idyllmtn.com>                http://kynn.com/
>Technical Developer Relations, Reef           http://www.reef.com/
>Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain Internet   http://idyllmtn.com/
>Contributor, Special Ed. Using XHTML     http://kynn.com/+seuxhtml
>Unofficial Section 508 Checklist       http://kynn.com/+section508
Received on Friday, 26 January 2001 08:32:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:38 GMT