- From: Jutta Treviranus <jutta.treviranus@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 15:28:15 -0500
- To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org, w3c-wai-au@w3.org
Another agenda item should probably be review of AERT document integration into the AU Techniques, and strategies for tackling unresolved issues. (Charles can you make sure the last draft from Jan is available for review). Thanks Jutta At 11:21 AM -0500 1/5/01, Leonard R. Kasday wrote: >Suggestions for the agenda at http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/meetings/9jan01.html > >Re Evaluation (and Repair) language (EARL) which is already on the agenda: > >What would motivate authoring tool designers to input EARL? To >output EARL? E.g., to avoid need to do all testing, to address test >results from third party. > >What should authoring tool do to make application of EARL easier >(e.g. id on each element) > > >Possible additional topic: >Also discussion of plenary. How to coordinate meetings? Have one >big meeting? Whom to invite? > > >Len >-- >Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. >Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at >Temple University >(215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) >http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org > >Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group >http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ > >The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: >http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Monday, 8 January 2001 15:28:32 UTC