- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 16:25:37 -0000
- To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>, "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
> semEngish sounds simpler syntactically, more lisp-ish. Do > you have a pointer to it? http://robustai.net/mentography/semenglish.html > Should we switch to semEnglish? No - it was pointed out shortly after Seth wrote the thing that an "]" is an allowed character in a URI, making it rather tricky. Therefore, you can't use [URI], because the trailing "]" could be part of the URI... if Seth used something like ^ instead, it might work, but the main problem is that there are no tool to process it anyway. N3 has an N3 => RDF parser, and even a logic based query engine: CWM. This is a shame, because structurally, semEnglish is a great improvement over Notation3. -- Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer @prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> . [ :name "Sean B. Palmer" ] :hasHomepage <http://infomesh.net/sbp/> .
Received on Monday, 5 February 2001 11:37:35 UTC