W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > April 2001

Re: EARL 0.9 ?

From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@mysterylights.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:27:33 +0100
Message-ID: <00b601c0c9a6$87a3ffc0$21dd93c3@z5n9x1>
To: <dd@w3.org>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Cc: <w3c-wai-pf@w3.org>
Daniel Dardailler <mailto:dd@w3.org> wrote:-

> I took an action item to propose ERT to release a
> "stable" version of EARL asap, [...]


> I suggest we release a document under
>  http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/earl0.9

Well, we have http://www.w3.org/2001/03/earl/ sitting there doing
absolutely nothing... I guess that could be the namespace for the
schema, and the documentation could be put at /WAI/ER/earl0.9, or
whatever. I'd like to have a datestamped namespace for the terms, due
to persistence. The W3C's persistence policy [1] only covers
date-stamped URIs.

> + use the english prose at
>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2001Mar/0015.html
> for documentation.

Yep, fine, but this will have to be converted into an RDF schema as
well. The RDF in /w3c-wai-er-ig/2001Mar/0028.html is just a few cases
of non-normative examples really... but it will be easy to make an RDF
schema from them.

[1] http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Persistence/

Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
@prefix : <http://webns.net/roughterms/> .
:Sean :hasHomepage <http://purl.org/net/sbp/> .
Received on Friday, 20 April 2001 10:30:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:32 UTC