- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:49:37 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Monday, Oct. 30, 10:00-11:30 Eastern USA Time (GMT -05:00) on the MIT
bridge (+1 617-258-7910).
Agenda:
Evaluation Results in XML, per recent discussion on the list.
- how to link evaluation to document: Interleave evaluation results in
source? Put evaluation in separate file and point into document via
XPath? Via Line Number? Via added pseudo-id attribute?
- how do these methods hold up when part of document changes, or parts
are re-arranged?
- where to maintain text describing violations? Individual tool
makers? W3C? If W3C, which group: er or wcag?
- Do "evaluation results in XML" cover saving the state of a document?
WCAG 2.0. We all had an action item to look at what checkpoints could be
determined automatically. This discussion may need to be brief, given the
first item.
I anyone has other agenda items please post to the list.
Len
--
Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple
University
(215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY)
http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org
Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/
The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant:
http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Friday, 27 October 2000 11:47:11 UTC