Jan, Looking good. One suggestion: in guideline 3 you have the more generic "prompt the author..." e.g. Prompt the author to identify the type of image (decorative, a navigation icon, etc.). While in the new section 4 you've inherited the "suggested messages" that we had in there, e.g. * Suggested Messages: * "Missing text equivalent: Missing text equivalent for image." Personally speaking, I like the generic way rather than the "suggested wording". Even if we tell the author it's only suggested, they might feel limited. I think this was where we were headed while AERT was over here in ER... Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP and Dept. of Electrical Engineering at Temple University (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday mailto:kasday@acm.org Chair, W3C Web Accessibility Initiative Evaluation and Repair Tools Group http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/Received on Friday, 3 November 2000 16:57:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:37 GMT