W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > March 2000

Re: Request for Review

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 06:02:34 -0500 (EST)
To: "Leonard R. Kasday" <kasday@acm.org>
cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0003110559370.2915-100000@tux.w3.org>
It does.

It is in fact based on a commercial website. The marketing people were
perfectly happy that people who did not have CSS enabled saw a different

We are not demanding anything. We are suggesting this as a possible template
that can be used in an authoring tool.

The question then is whether this particular style sheet prodces any bugs (I
am aware of one minor problem - MSIE 4 does not seem to support
display:block, so the links in the nav bar are not presented one per line as
they are in Netscape 4.

Charles McCN

On Fri, 10 Mar 2000, Leonard R. Kasday wrote:

  http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/WD-ATAG10-TECHS-20000308/templates/cmnMain - A "home
  It uses style sheets for layout and background colors, which means that 
  browsers that don't support these features see a radically different 
  looking page.
  Plus in general there are still bugs in CSS layout even on browsers that 
  support them.
  So we could get some understandable resistance from tool makers to seem to 
  demand only CSS layout.
  Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
  Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and
  Department of Electrical Engineering
  Temple University
  423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122
  (215) 204-2247 (voice)
  (800) 750-7428 (TTY)

Charles McCathieNevile    mailto:charles@w3.org    phone: +61 (0) 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative                      http://www.w3.org/WAI
Location: I-cubed, 110 Victoria Street, Carlton VIC 3053
Postal: GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne 3001,  Australia 
Received on Saturday, 11 March 2000 06:02:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:30 UTC