LK:: "Or does the W3C take on the role of evaluating tools?" WL: I can't speak for W3C but I think the idea of us evaluating tools vs. reporting on individual's experience with them is out of bounds. I assume that by evaluation you mean some sort of "Good Websiting Seal of Approval"? This is a monumental task and subject to all kinds of litigative possibilities, bribery (maybe it's not that bad - any openings for an "objective" evaluator) - on the whole probably unthinkable. I get uncomfortable just talking about it! -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE http://dicomp.pair.comReceived on Friday, 9 June 2000 16:34:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:36 GMT