- From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 19:00:20 -0400
- To: mailto:
Al asked > When confronted with an arbitrarily deep nest (tree) of lists, do you mean > one should wrap > > 1) the innermost only > 2) the outermost only Ian replied: Yes, the outermost only is what I meant. That may not be sufficient for deep nested lists. But authors should probably avoid long lists of links anyway. Actually, it doesn't even work for one level of nesting... like I mentioned, map inside map is an HTML 4.01 syntax error. I think there are reasonable uses of nested links, e.g. subject headings and a few links under each heading, which is a very common idiom in portals. It's also arguably an accommodation for people with motor disabilities since it reduces mouse clicks. So I don't think we can ignore this limitation of map. Len -- Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D. Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and Department of Electrical Engineering Temple University 423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122 kasday@acm.org http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday (215) 204-2247 (voice) (800) 750-7428 (TTY) The WAVE web page accessibility evaluation assistant: http://www.temple.edu/inst_disabilities/piat/wave/
Received on Sunday, 23 July 2000 18:54:50 UTC