W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2000

RE: new technique: Technique 9.5.1 [priority 3] Check for "accesskey" attribute

From: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 14:43:30 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000128144312.009e0390@localhost>
To: "Michael Cooper" <mcooper@cast.org>, <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
ah, yes. ok.  i've deleted it for now.
--w

At 01:33 PM 1/28/00 , Michael Cooper wrote:
>The HTML spec actually doesn't define the ACCESSKEY attribute for the SELECT
>element. I'm not sure why since it does have it for INPUT, but I assume it's
>because an INPUT whose TYPE is not "text" will not have an associated LABEL
>element to receive the ACCESSKEY, whereas any SELECT element will. But
>anyway the spec isn't clear so I don't know if we should keep SELECT in the
>list, or add those provisions for INPUT, or what. Michael
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org
> > [mailto:w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm
> > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 12:40 PM
> > To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> > Subject: new technique: Technique 9.5.1 [priority 3] Check for
> > "accesskey" attribute
> >
> >
> > Technique 9.5.1 [priority 3] Check for "accesskey" attribute
> > Discussion Status:
> > awaiting discussion
> > Evaluation:
> > Check the following elements for an "accesskey" attribute:
> > A
> > AREA
> > BUTTON
> > INPUT
> > LABEL
> > LEGEND
> > SELECT
> > TEXTAREA
> > Example Language:
> > Create short keys to important active elements on this page.
> > Repair Technique:
> > none
> > Test Files and Discussion Files:
> > --
> > wendy a chisholm
> > world wide web consortium
> > web accessibility initiative
> > madison, wi usa
> > tel: +1 608 663 6346
> > /--

--
wendy a chisholm
world wide web consortium
web accessibility initiative
madison, wi usa
tel: +1 608 663 6346
/--
Received on Friday, 28 January 2000 14:41:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:34 GMT