W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > January 2000

RE: Technique 3.4.A [priority 2] Check document for relative or absolute units.

From: Michael Cooper <mcooper@cast.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 18:34:53 -0500
To: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NCBBJOMIELMIDGCAPFCIEEEBCOAA.mcooper@cast.org>
Looks good - I'd add the "ex" unit (about half an em) to the list of
acceptable values. Michael

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Wendy A Chisholm
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2000 6:28 PM
> To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> Subject: Technique 3.4.A [priority 2] Check document for relative or
> absolute units.
>
>
> reworded based on michael's suggestions:
>
> Technique 3.4.A [priority 2] Check document for relative or
> absolute units.
> Discussion Status:
> awaiting discussion
> Evaluation:
> For any HTML element defined to take a %LENGTH, %PIXELS, %MULTILENGTH, or
> %MULTILENGTHS, a validated value should either end with "%" or begin with
> "+" or "-" or use the "em" unit.
> Exception: "width" and "height" attributes of IMG elements.
> Example Language:
> This element uses absolute units of measure rather than relative units of
> measure.
> Repair Technique:
> Allow user to change the units of measure.
> Test Files and Discussion Files:
> --
> wendy a chisholm
> world wide web consortium
> web accessibility initiative
> madison, wi usa
> tel: +1 608 663 6346
> /--
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 26 January 2000 18:43:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:34 GMT