W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > February 2000

Re: Verify that layout tables make sense when linearized (Technique 5.3.1)

From: Leonard R. Kasday <kasday@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:43:19 -0500
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20000220204253.00b92740@pop3.concentric.net>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>, w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Wendy's edit looks fine to me.

Len

At 05:31 PM 2/18/00 -0500, Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
>In Len's comments from the 23rd of January [1]  about the 21 December 
>draft [2] he asked that the WCAG definition for a linearized table be 
>included in checkpoint 5.3.  There was some other clean-up to do as well.
>
>I propose:
><blockquote>
>Checkpoint 5.3 - Do not use tables for layout unless the table makes sense 
>when linearized
>Technique 5.3.1 [priority 2] Verify that  layout tables make sense when 
>linearized
>
>Discussion Status:
>under discussion
>
>Evaluation:
>A TABLE element will trigger this evaluation.
>This technique applies only to tables used for layout purposes, not to 
>data tables.
>
>Example of a message to be displayed:
>Tables used for layout should make sense when linearized.
>When a table is 'linearized,' the cells are read in the order in which 
>they appear in the HTML source.
>
>Repair Technique:
>Linearize the table and ask the author to verify that the result is 
>understandable.
>
>Test Files and Discussion Files:
>Link to test file for this technique.
></blockquote>
>
>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-er-ig/2000Jan/0059.html
>[2] http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/IG/ert/ert-19991221.html
>
>
>--
>wendy a chisholm
>world wide web consortium
>web accessibility initiative
>madison, wi usa
>tel: +1 608 663 6346
>/--
>

-------
Leonard R. Kasday, Ph.D.
Institute on Disabilities/UAP, and
Department of Electrical Engineering
Temple University
423 Ritter Annex, Philadelphia, PA 19122

kasday@acm.org
http://astro.temple.edu/~kasday

(215) 204-2247 (voice)
(800) 750-7428 (TTY)
Received on Sunday, 20 February 2000 21:12:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Thursday, 9 June 2005 12:10:34 GMT