- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown.scheuhammer@utoronto.ca>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 14:22:57 -0400
- To: Chris Ridpath <chris.ridpath@utoronto.ca>
- CC: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Chris Ridpath wrote:
>
> Perhaps the language is not clear. The intention is to suggest an existing
> LONGDESC for a file that does not have a LONGDESC.
>
> If the same image is used in two places on a site and one image has a
> LONGDESC while the other does not, suggest that the image without the
> LONGDESC use the LONGDESC from the image that has one.
>
> Does that make sense?
>
> Chris R.
Getting a bit wordy maybe? How about:
If another document on the same site references a LONDESC for the image,
then suggest that LONDESC file.
Which, unfortunately, leads to the question: What if the same image has
multiple long descriptions depending on the context it appears in? I
guess you offer all existing LONDESC files for that image.
--
;;;;joseph.
'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draussen.'
- C. Carter -
Received on Friday, 3 September 1999 14:11:13 UTC