- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 16:43:06 -0400
- To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
- Cc: Evaluation & Repair Interest Group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
aloha, wendy!
i'd much prefer an introductary interface such as the one you described than
simply having a link to an "advanced" feedback form...
as for wording, rather than quote I want to give general feedback about the
site. unquote, might we say:
I want to let the site's maintainer know that I can't use the site
or words to that effect? i fear that the term quote general feedback unquote
is too vague...
gregory.
Wendy wrote:
>If we have two forms (which I'm not opposed to) how will a user decide
>which one they want to use? I think it will add one more step to the
>process, but if it is does well i don't think it will be a problem.
>
>One possibility:
>
>[] I want to give a technical review of the site. Note: knowledge of HTML
>and WCAG required.
>[] I want to give general feedback about the site.
>
>I do not know if these are the best ways to say this,but it's a start.
--------------------------------------------------------
He that lives on Hope, dies farting
-- Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1763
--------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita <unagi69@concentric.net>
WebMaster and Minister of Propaganda, VICUG NYC
<http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/vicug/index.html>
--------------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 1999 16:37:08 UTC