- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 09:05:07 +0200
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <unagi69@concentric.net>
- cc: Evaluation & Repair Interest Group <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org>
> blink > Text blinks (alternates between visible and invisible). > Conforming user agents are not required to support > this value. this just means it's not part of a conformance criteria. > so, am i correct in concluding that there is no "approved" CSS equiv > for BLINK there is an approved one, but in order to claim CSS2 conformance, you don't need to implement it I think it's ok to tell people to use it; as you said, no big deal if it doesn't work.
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 1999 03:05:14 UTC