- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 04 May 1999 12:26:32 +0200
- To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
Present:
Daniel Dardailler (chair/scribe)
William Loughborough
Chris Ridpath
Bruce Bailey
Len Kasday
Michael Cooper
Next meeting: not decided.
- we started late because of MIT bridge problem ("just rings")
then we used the list of issues sent to the list as basis for our
discussion.
- background issue: best is to force the body and put the original
page and its background in a table cell (this way if table color are
not supported, at least the bobby report is readable, and the page
background is lost)
- upload feature for 3.2; need to see how to address the issue of
attached content (e.g. image) when html is uploaded.
- in this case download seems irrelevant too.
btw, should download info be there by default ? same with browser
compatibility (opinions vary in the call on what should be presented
by default)
- how feasible is an algorithm for checking contrast background ?
discuss various techniques using intensity, color blindness
intelligence, etc. probably not for 3.2 but for 4.0
- issue with less/combining hats: Michael agrees it's bad looking
today, not sure how much can be fixed this week
- issue with back pointers to the page from the report, for 3.2 probably
- Daniel suggested to put the report first and the content-with-hat later
only when back link are implemented
(would also solve unterminated element issue)
right now moving the toc menu up would be enough
- disclaimer/manual
people things the bobby approved logo should go after the manual
checking: Michael to look at that for this release
discussed idea of keeping approved page in a database
- discussion alt="" for A and AREA and no href in the page (or no
content in the anchor)
- Len also suggested for special alt to look at
the idiosynchracies of popular editors (alt="foo.gif 234K" in FP)
- tentative timeline: 3.2 targeted in 2 months, 4.0 Xmas 99
Received on Tuesday, 4 May 1999 06:26:36 UTC