W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > November 1998

Re: Web report form (2)

From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 14:58:36 +0100
Message-Id: <199811051358.OAA18727@www47.inria.fr>
To: Harvey Bingham <hbingham@acm.org>
cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org

> Daniel's report form at
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/report>http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/report
> Sheet 2, the report about a URL cannot be put on that URL itself.

I think I understand the confusion.

[http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/rep2 is an optional step that lists relevant
URLs already entered in the system so that the reporter can decide
whether or not a new one is needed.]

Although they looked like they do, the "existing report" links do not
point to the URL itself but to a report area, still to be defined,
likely to be an mailing list archive, ala:

I made some changes in the wording to make it clearer.

> The alternative is to provide a standard place that all the reviews
> can be put.

Yes, I could add a pointer to the archive on this step.
> How do we find the webmaster to send the report notifications.

I changed step3 so that the tool tries to guess it and presents it to
the user in an edit field.
> Each report needs to identify the date or version of the URL, in case
> it is updated.

Doesn't the date of the report (email archived) suffice ?
> The fixer should have the ability to return a message indicating
> the attempts made to fix the URL.

Just replying the report email should do it:

  From: w3c-wai-report@w3.org
  To: webmaster@offender.com
  cc: reporter@foo.com, w3c-wai-report@w3.org
  Subject: WAI Report - www.offender.com/page

and replies give

  From: webmaster@offender.com
  To: w3c-wai-report@w3.org
  cc: reporter@foo.com
  Subject: Re: WAI Report - www.offender.com/page

which goes to the list archive/forum of discussion.
Received on Thursday, 5 November 1998 08:58:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:27 UTC