W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org > November 1998

Re: Research activities

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@access.digex.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 23:17:33 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199811020417.XAA21596@access5.digex.net>
To: marja@w3.org (Marja-Riitta Koivunen)
Cc: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
I think I have not been clear.

When I said only the 'scavenger' was a fit subject for research,
it was not because the editor plugin is not desirable.  It is
just so clearly desirable that our friends at the University of
Toronto already have it under development.  No need for research
to demonstrate the utility.

Please check over the minutes from the last ER WG telephone
conference for a little information on what projects are underway
and expected in this area.


to follow up on what Marja-Riitta Koivunen said:
> From w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org  Sun Nov  1 22:57:37 1998
> Resent-Date: Sun, 1 Nov 1998 22:56:42 -0500 (EST)
> Resent-Message-Id: <199811020356.WAA29662@www19.w3.org>
> Message-Id: <>
> X-Sender: marja@localhost
> X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 2.2 (32)
> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 1998 22:56:33 +0200
> To: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> From: Marja-Riitta Koivunen <marja@w3.org>
> Subject: Research activities
> Resent-From: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> X-Mailing-List: <w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org> archive/latest/108
> X-Loop: w3c-wai-er-ig@w3.org
> Sender: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org
> Resent-Sender: w3c-wai-er-ig-request@w3.org
> Precedence: list

> >Al wrote
> >
> >>I see.  Well, only the scavenger is a topic fit for research.
> >
> >LRK::
> >(This is changed subject from a thread on a tool that helps authors insert
> >alt text vs. a tool that tries to automatically figure out the alt text.
> >Al  called the latter the "scavenger".)
> >Is a user interface and associated prompt that asks authors to insert ALT
> >text  also a subject for research?   Al's remark seems to suggest that it
> >isn't.
> >
> >I'd especially like to hear from human factors folks on this one.  
> >
> >Len
> Are you thinking about a prompt in an authoring tool?
> I think it is important to remember that the user (in this case the designer
> should be in control). So forcing the designer to do something at a certain
> moment, however important that is, might not be a very good idea. Designers
> in the middle of thinking/doing something else might easily just put
> something in the ALT text to be able to continue their current thought. And
> when that something is there it later seems that that part was already done,
> even though it was meant to be temporary.
> I think there is research to be done in how to best do this thing starting
> from the way designers design their pages. I'm not sure whose responsibility
> is what part of the design. Some of this is or at least should be done by
> the authoring tool companies.
> The solutions based on the research could include things like clearly
> highlighting the images with missing alt while the page is being designed,
> having a link check tool similar to a spelling check tool in a document that
> would point out all the problems with links when activated, having easy
> access to a help text that could explain with examples what is a good way to
> use alt text, having tools that show list of all the alt text strings in a
> site without or with the corresponding images and without or with the
> textual context so that it is easy to see wheather the ALT explanations make
> sense etc.
> There could also be databases with often used images that attach a default
> ALT text to an image e.g. a logo automatically if not overridden, so that
> the ALT would be more consistently used accross a site and the user wouldn't
> have to worry about it.
> These are just some examples that came to my mind. I'm not sure if I
> answered your question.
>   Marja
Received on Sunday, 1 November 1998 23:17:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:27 UTC