Re: WCAG 2.1 in the FAQ

Looks good to me. Only comment: "Late comments would delay the 
standard." should be "Late comments may not be able to be considered in 
time to be addressed in this version of WCAG." I do not want to imply 
any opportunity for people to try to delay us. Michael


On 3/9/2017 8:11 PM, Shawn Henry wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am updating "What about WCAG 2.1?" at
>     https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/wcag2faq#v21
>
> Suggestions for edits very welcome.
>
> (The WCAG Overview links to that FAQ question under "WCAG 2.1 and 
> other guidelines" <https://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/wcag#wcag21> -- rather 
> than have redundant info in both places.)
>
> Best,
> ~Shawn
>
>
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 02:38:58 UTC