W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2013

RE: EOWG quick action for all - including list lurkers

From: Kathleen Anderson <kathleen.anderson@spiderwebwoman.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 12:20:02 -0400
To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000001ce8f9c$24ea7b60$6ebf7220$@anderson@spiderwebwoman.com>
"Alternatively it should be moved up in that section nearer to the beginning
and not be called a "Note"."  

I agree.


~ Kathleen Anderson
Spider Web Woman Designs
Email: kathleen.anderson@spiderwebwoman.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Sailesh Panchang [mailto:sailesh.panchang@deque.com] 
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2013 12:09 PM
To: Shawn Henry
Cc: EOWG (E-mail)
Subject: Re: EOWG quick action for all - including list lurkers

Shawn,
It is ok where it is but should be worded as "It is important to note that
....", instead of just "Note:". Notes like those are generally considered
supplementary  / advisory info and can be missed easily.
Alternatively it should be moved up in that section nearer to the beginning
and not be called a "Note".
Sailesh



On 8/2/13, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote:
> Hi EOWG list folks,
>
> WCAG WG would like more input on one small point - where to put a Note 
> in the "Understanding Techniques for WCAG Success Criteria" section.
>
> The question is at:
> <http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/wiki/WCAG_review#Question:_Where_does_this_N
> ote_fit_better.3F>
>
> Would you take a few mins to read this and think about it?
>
> If you're not an active participant in EOWG and cannot edit the 
> wiki,*please reply to this e-mail with your thoughts*.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~Shawn
>
>
Received on Sunday, 4 August 2013 11:53:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:56:01 UTC