W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > April to June 2013

Tutorials review for this week

From: Bim Egan <bim@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 18:45:08 +0100
To: "'EOWG \(E-mail\)'" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5DAFCA0FFB3D4F4E9211E71589D9C85C@bimlaptop>
Hi EOWG,

Please could you review the tutorial pages starting at: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/
These are to be discussed in Friday's meeting. 

At this stage, areas that we would like you to focus on are:

1. How do these drafts work for different roles? 
For example
* If you were a developer, is this engaging enough for you to read?
* If you were a trainer, is it organized in a way you can use? 
* If you were non-technical, for instance a student, is it understandable?

2. We need to reconsider what these should be called. Can we have another
brainstorm for other possibilities? 

3. Currently we're using two different approaches. Please compare the
overall approach used in the tables vs the images tutorials. Pages to focus
on:
Images:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/images/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/images/functional
Tables: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/tables/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/app-notes/tables/th-caption

4. How can we make it clearer that each topic covers multiple web pages?

5. Each page has links to more info in WCAG. How can we present these so
they don't detract from people progressing through the other pages in each
topic?

Kind regards,

Bim
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 17:45:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:19:02 UTC