- From: catherine <ecrire@catherine-roy.net>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:07:30 -0400
- To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Hi, Shawn Henry wrote: > catherine wrote: > ... >> My only hesitation is with the "badly-written" part of the last >> sentence. I wonder if we really need it since we have "that are not >> accessible". Seems a bit redundant. Maybe just say : "However, Web >> sites and Web tools that are not accessible create barriers that >> exclude people from taking equal part." ? > > I'd like some more perspectives on this issue. I think Liam wanted to > specifically say that the web is designed to be accessible, and when > websites are done properly, they are accessible -- but when websites are > *badly* done, then they create barriers. (actually his suggestion: > "badly written web pages... re-introduce these barriers") > > Saying "websites that are not accessible create barriers that > exclude..." kind of loses the point that it's bad. > > wording options: > a. However, badly written websites and web tools create barriers that > exclude... > b. However, badly written websites and web tools that are not accessible > create barriers that exclude... > c. However, websites and web tools that are not accessible create > barriers that exclude... > > Any other thoughts on this point? Ok, seemed a bit redundant to me but I understand. Although badly written web tools sounds a bit strange to me. Perhaps replace badly written with badly designed or poorly designed ? Anyway, it is not that important and I do not want to hold things up on a detail such as this so whatever you guys decide to use will be fine. Catherine -- Catherine Roy http://www.catherine-roy.net
Received on Saturday, 29 August 2009 20:07:55 UTC