W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2009

Pending issues for Mobile Web Accessibility document

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:14:38 +0100
Message-ID: <49944AEE.2030804@technosite.es>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, MWI BPWG Public <public-bpwg@w3.org>

Before submitting this document [1] to other WGs for review there are 
some matters to be discussed and either abandoned or implemented. the 
following is simply an extract of what appears in the "pending edits" 
page [2]. It may be easier to refer directly to that page rather than 
this summary as the items are all prefixed with "PENDING".


Alan/Shawn consider subnav on Overview page [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action06]

Consider add link to the contents (like on other pages...) [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action07]

Shawn & Alan - look at how to put preference on WCAG 2.0 in both the 
overview and also in the subpages. [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action01]

Shawn proposes moving some of the info from the technical overview page 
to the WAI intro page. and look at edits based on points from EOWG 
discussion... [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/09/19-eo-minutes.html#action04]

Include audience section but not for next draft. Was last included in 
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20080606/. 
Comment: This had previously been rejected by EOWG.

Single HTML page (13/06/2008 WAI EOWG, 
http://www.w3.org/2008/06/13-eo-minutes.html#action08)

Acronyms in H1 (13/06/2008 WAI EOWG, 
http://www.w3.org/2008/06/13-eo-minutes.html#action01).

Explain difference in approach between MWBPs and WCAG, testability, best 
practices v. success criteria.

Think about using an icon to highlight BPs that do give compliance with 
WCAG. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg/2008Feb

Top Menu: In the top menu, again MWBP does not have a version, would it 
be better to have the version number for consistency and for the future 
developments? Comment: further discussion needed. No new version of MWBP 
is expected (WG has now moved on to MWABP)

Why No WCAG to MWBP Mapping Table?: It would be good to give an example 
why the relationships are not symmetrical. Otherwise it is not clear.

Alan to consider rephrase of "compliance" section [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/15-eo-minutes.html#action04]

Shadi to summarize different perspectives of WCAG and MWBP [recorded in 
http://www.w3.org/2008/02/15-eo-minutes.html#action05]


[1] 
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/latest
[2] 
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/pending.html

-- 
Alan Chuter
Departamento de Usabilidad y Accesibilidad
Consultor
Technosite - Grupo Fundosa
FundaciĆ³n ONCE
Tfno.: 91 121 03 30
Fax: 91 375 70 51
achuter@technosite.es
http://www.technosite.es
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 16:17:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:55:57 UTC