RE: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion

Me too +1

 

~ Helle

 

________________________________

From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henny Swan
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 7:13 AM
To: William Loughborough
Cc: shawn@w3.org; w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Subject: Re: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion

 

I think that makes a lot of sense, great suggestion.

 

+ 1

 

Henny

 

On 18 Sep 2008, at 19:25, William Loughborough wrote:





+1

Love.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, <shawn@w3.org> wrote:


>>    <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/glance/>

From:    "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>

I just wanted to suggest using "audio and video content" instead of
"multimedia content". What do most people call those things on You Tube?
videos. What do people rent at Netflix, Blockbuster, and Hollywood Video?
videos. People don't think of videos as video only with no audio content.
So if you used "audio and video content", I think you would capture all
the types of content covered under guideline 1.2 and avoid the issue that
multimedia is often confused with "Flash".

Andi
andisnow@us.ibm.com




 

 

 

 

---

Henny Swan

Web Evangelist
www.opera.com <http://www.opera.com/>  (work)
www.iheni.com <http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/>  (personal)

Study the Web Standards Curriculum www.opera.com/wsc