W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2008

RE: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion

From: Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:37:06 +0200
Message-ID: <48E9FBE6442A6040BE44D6C11258A8B01C2E41@VFSSBS01.vfs.local>
To: <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Cc: "Henny Swan" <hennys@opera.com>, "William Loughborough" <wloughborough@gmail.com>
Me too +1

 

~ Helle

 

________________________________

From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Henny Swan
Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 7:13 AM
To: William Loughborough
Cc: shawn@w3.org; w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Subject: Re: WCAG 2.0 at a Glance - edit suggestion

 

I think that makes a lot of sense, great suggestion.

 

+ 1

 

Henny

 

On 18 Sep 2008, at 19:25, William Loughborough wrote:





+1

Love.

On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:58 AM, <shawn@w3.org> wrote:


>>    <http://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG20/glance/>

From:    "Andi Snow-Weaver" <andisnow@us.ibm.com>

I just wanted to suggest using "audio and video content" instead of
"multimedia content". What do most people call those things on You Tube?
videos. What do people rent at Netflix, Blockbuster, and Hollywood Video?
videos. People don't think of videos as video only with no audio content.
So if you used "audio and video content", I think you would capture all
the types of content covered under guideline 1.2 and avoid the issue that
multimedia is often confused with "Flash".

Andi
andisnow@us.ibm.com




 

 

 

 

---

Henny Swan

Web Evangelist
www.opera.com <http://www.opera.com/>  (work)
www.iheni.com <http://www.brucelawson.co.uk/>  (personal)

Study the Web Standards Curriculum www.opera.com/wsc

 

 





 

Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 12:38:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:51 GMT