Comments on comparison document

hello Andrew and all,
here are some comments on document comparison at:
<http://www.w3.org/WAI/WAI-AGE/comparative.html>
I like the introduction which is very clear.
1. for the title, many of suggested titles are too long and complicated. 
my preferences are for:
"Comparison of literature on senior accessibility to the web compared to 
WAI guidelines", or:
"Comparison of WAI guidelines against the requirements of older Web 
users identified in the literature".

2. In the list of items gathering what the appendix includes, second 
bullet refers to UTAG and not UAAG.
3. In first table, perceivable :
"Avoid bold body-text (except for emphasis)", "Avoid underlined text
(do use for links)," "Avoid fluorescent colours", "Ensure links change 
colour after visit", "Clearly separate links":  
  : in the column for wcag 2.0 it refers to perceivable, which has no 
guideline number nor success criteria number, but only principle name. 
Could it be more precise ?
  Same question for: "Ensure links change colour after visit", "Clearly 
separate links  
", which refer to perceivable operable.

Best regards
Sylvie