- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:04:31 +0100
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>
On 26/03/2008, Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> wrote: > > I think the 3 primary use cases for the documents are (where the "I" could be a developer, manager, policy maker, etc.): > 1. I know WCAG 1.0 and now I also want to do MWBP. > 2. I know MWBP, and now I also want to do WCAG 2.0. > 3. I haven't done much with either accessibility or designing for mobile devices, and now I want to do both. > > Question: How common is #2 - that is, are many people familiar with MWBP? The difference with #2 is that accessibility is a legal requirement in many jurisdictions. Maybe mobile-friendliness will be one day, but *now* most people ought to know about accessibility. We hope that MWBP will become better known and I'm sure that the BPWG will want to help with that. With #3, we shouldn't assume that if people know both, that they won't neeed any help. It sounds plausible butin practice most people will need clarification to avoid getting things wrong. I think that there's scope for a short introductory high-level document that doesn't actually mention any SCs or BPs except as examples. Based on the experiences document. A. -- Alan Chuter, Senior Web Accessibility Consultant, Technosite (www.technosite.es) Researcher, Inredis Project (www.inredis.es/) Email: achuter@technosite.es Alternative email: achuter.technosite@yahoo.com Blogs: www.blogger.com/profile/09119760634682340619
Received on Thursday, 27 March 2008 15:05:09 UTC