Comments on MWBP & WCAG overview page

First of all, I would like to apologise for not attending the last  
meeting. I did not receive emails from the group and somehow assumed  
that a meeting was not scheduled.

I have some comments on the MWBP & WCAG overview document.

Alan, would it be better to send my comments to both groups?

Page title
- It would be good to remove the versioning of the MWBP from the main  
title. This is because of the following reasons: (1) WCAG does not  
have a version and for consistency it would be better not to have it  
for MWBP; (2) and the new version of MWB is under development so I  
would imagine when the new version will be available, there will be  
another document comparing the new version of the MWBP with the  
existing WCAG guidelines;

Top Menu
- In the top menu, again MWBP does not have a version, would it be  
better to have the version number for consistency and for the future  
developments?

Abstract
- Would it be useful to add links to WCAG and MWBP?
- Only WCAG has the acronym but not MWBP.

How to use this document section
- There is only WCAG 2.0 and MWBP 1.0 Together document, why not have  
WCAG 2.0 and MWBP 1.0 together, or if there is a reason for that I  
think it would be good to explain it here.

Why No WCAG to MWBP Mapping Table?
- It would be good to give an example why the relationships are not  
symmetrical. Otherwise it is not clear.

Testing with Users and Devices
- It would be better to replace "Mobile Web Best Practices" with MWBP  
for consistency.
- It would be good to add devices to this sentence: "User testing  
should always include a full range of users...".

Related Documents of Interest
- What about adding this page (http://www.w3.org/WAI/mobile/) to the  
list?

Best regards,
Yeliz
--------------------------------------------------------
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
Manchester
M13 9PL

URL: http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~yesilady
Tel:  +44 (0) 161 275 6239
Fax: +44 (0) 845 139 5599
--------------------------------------------------------

Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2008 14:04:00 UTC