W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: Usefulness of compliance section in Web Accessible Mobile document

From: Sean Owen <srowen@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:38:07 -0500
Message-ID: <e920a71c0802190638l2e1e1702r3f32cdaa5e62f380@mail.gmail.com>
To: achuter.technosite@yahoo.com
Cc: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>, "MWI BPWG Public" <public-bpwg@w3.org>

I think this is the very difference between Best Practices and
mobileOK. Best Practices are non-normative guidelines. mobileOK is a
normative description of test suites based upon those guidelines. So
"yes" in the sense that this is what mobileOK 2.0 would be about.

On Feb 19, 2008 6:28 AM, Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es> wrote:
> On last Friday's EOWG call in the discussion [1] of the "From Mobile
> Web Best Practices 1.0 to Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0"
> document, under ACCESS_KEY [2] it was mentioned that while using
> access keys is not required by WCAG 2.0, using them may be considered
> best practice and so it should be mentioned. My argument is that what
> people are really interested in is whether they achieve compliance or
> not. Should there be another section on doing the right thing even
> when it isn't needed for compliance?
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2008 14:38:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:47 GMT