- From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:51:07 +0200
- To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Yesterday in the BPWG call several changes were proposed for the document [1] which it would be useful to discuss in today's EOWG call: * The document should include an audience section, but not for the upcoming public draft. * Restore the "Relationship" word to the main title. * Include a subheading, "Overview" on that page, to differentiate it. * The "Managing Overlapping Requirements" heading could include the "Benefiting" word by changing it to "Benefiting from Overlapping Requirements", thus implying that while overlaps are not intrinsically beneficial, they can be benefited from. * Remove [contents] link from the navigation at the top of the overview page because it's not consistent with the other pages (controversial I think). * In the "nothing" and "something" lists, the links are intra-page links to the detail below. In the "nothing" section they look the same but point to the WCAG and MWBPs documents. They should be differentiated. This is not such a problem if the "everything" section is removed later as agreed, but even then something is needed to indicate that they are intra-page links, as people would naturally think that they point to the CPs or BPs. Perhaps at the end of each item. For example: <a href="wcag">1.1.1, Non-text Content</a>, covered by NON-TEXT_ALTERNATIVES. Refer to <a href="#non-text-content-section-in-this-document">1.1.1, Non-text Content, below<a> regards, Alan [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/ED-mwbp-wcag-20080624/ -- Alan Chuter achuter@technosite.es Technosite http://www.technosite.es
Received on Friday, 27 June 2008 07:52:43 UTC