Hey Justin, Thanks for these good comments, very helpful. here is the new doc...I thought I had sent it earlier but this worked out since it gave me a chance incorporate your philosophy, excellent! See (hear) everyone in the morning! Sharron At 12:54 PM 11/29/2007, Justin Thorp wrote: >Few comments... > >*My general FAQ philosophy* >When I read a FAQ, I expect that in the first sentence or two of the >answer I'll get the answer to the question. Because people scan so >much when they read online, I wouldn't expect that people would read >much more than a sentence or two anyhow. > >So when i read questions like... 2. What is WAI-ARIA intended to do? >In the answer i'd be looking for it to say... WAI-ARIA is intended >to [fill in the blank]. > >*3. Is WAI-ARIA available and supported now?* >http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/ARIA/faq.html#available > >What does this (the first paragraph) have to do with wether WAI-ARIA >is available or supported now? > >"ARIA is being developed under the W3C Process, more thoroughly >discussed elsewhere. The process is ongoing and is intended to >reflect the diverse needs of a broad community, including industry, >disability organizations, accessibility researchers, government, and >others interested in Web accessibility." > >Are we really asking what is the status of WAI-ARIA? Maybe this >question would help from being multiple questions. > > >****************** >Justin Thorp >US Library of Congress >Web Services - Office of Strategic Initiatives >e - juth@loc.gov >p - 202/707-9541 > > >>> Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org> 11/28/2007 6:57 PM >>> >3. WAI-ARIA FAQ >* http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/ARIA/faq.html >An updated version and specific questions for EOWG will be available >before the teleconference.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 10:45:59 GMT