Yeah, I take the philosophical point of view that the success criterias should be understandable, to a degree, by themselves without any supplementary materials. I should be able to get the gist of what they're saying without having to read the background material. Based on what I think they're trying to communicate in 3.1.4, I don't think it's as clear as it could be. - justin ****************** Justin Thorp US Library of Congress Web Services - Office of Strategic Initiatives e - juth@loc.gov p - 202/707-9541 >>> Judy Brewer <jbrewer@w3.org> 11/19/2007 2:26:12 PM >>> In other words, rather than just saying "We still have difficulty with this one" I think we should say something like "We believe that this success criteria is less understandable when read on its own than many of the other success criteria, and -- regardless of whatever information may be available in the glossary and Understanding document -Received on Monday, 19 November 2007 19:38:46 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 September 2008 10:45:59 GMT