Regrets: EOWG: Agenda and Readings for 19 October 2007 Teleconference

Regrets, I'll be at a round table with Google on Friday.

I have done some mapping around mobile and WCAG guidelines which I can
dig out and send if anyone is interested though.


Henny 

-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] On
Behalf Of Shawn Henry
Sent: 16 October 2007 15:33
To: EOWG (E-mail)
Subject: EOWG: Agenda and Readings for 19 October 2007 Teleconference
Importance: High


Dear EOWG Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 19 October 2007 teleconference
follow.

Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
	        http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200 / +33.4.89.06.34.99 / +44.117.370.6152, code:
EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665

Scribe:	*Henny* (per www..w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes )

BACKGROUND:
The W3C "Mobile Web Best Practices" (MWBP)
<http://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-bp/> provides advice on creating Web
content that works well on mobile devices. There is some overlap between
MWBP and WCAG. This discussion is about documenting that overlap.

READINGS:
* http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dftkhw2k_21dw7jpf
- "Mobile Web Best Practices and WCAG document, goals and audience":
Review all sections
* http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dftkhw2k_16w7bkx7
- "Use Cases for the document Relationship between...": Review all
*
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/la
test
- Section 1. Introduction: Review all subsections
- Section 2. How Barriers Experienced by Web Users with Disabilities
Parallel those in the Mobile Context: Review the first paragraphs, and
skim the table
- Section 3. How Mobile Web Best Practices can Benefit Users with
Disabilities: Review the first part, and skim the details 

Agenda:

1. Relationship between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 and Web Content
Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
* Purpose and audience:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dftkhw2k_21dw7jpf
* Use cases: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dftkhw2k_16w7bkx7
* Draft document:
http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/TaskForces/Accessibility/drafts/la
test

Questions:
1. Overall reactions to the draft document?
2. Comments on the purpose, goals, objectives?
3. Comments on the target audiences? Are all these audiences basically
equal, or some primary and other secondary?
4. Comments on the use cases? Are all these basically equal, or some
primary and other secondary?

(Back to the draft document:)
5. Does the overall organization and approach to the document meet the
expected usage by the target audience and the use cases? How might it
better meet the needs of the primary target audiences and use cases?

(Some specifics:)
6. How should the purpose/goals/objectives be expressed in the first
section (1.1)?
7. How should the target audiences be expressed in the first section
(1.3)?
8. What information is needed about the Scope, section 1.4?
9. Is the Terminology section 1.7 clear? Should additional information
be added, or pointed to in other documents?
10. Should more background be provided in the Introduction section, or
linked to?

(The other sections:)
11. Is the concept behind section 2 (Parallel Barriers Experienced by
Web Users with Disabilities) expressed clearly? Is its usefulness (to
help people understand why there is so much overlap) clear?
12. Is the thinking behind section 3 (How Mobile Web Best Practices can
Benefit Users with Disabilities) expressed clearly?
13. In section 3, there are numerous hyperlinks to WCAG Techniques.
Would it be better to include or quote the Techniques here to make the
document printable? Doing so would make it very long.

----
Note: Shawn will not be at the teleconference as she will be presenting
at a conference. Judy will chair the discussion.

Regards,
~ Shawn and Judy

===

NOTE: If you reply to this email, please change the subject line. If you
are sending regrets, add "Regrets" to the front of the current subject
line. If you are commenting on a document or topic, put the document
title or topic in the subject line. Thanks.

IRC reminders and tips:
- IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC.
All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just
in IRC).
- To type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes,
type /me comment - e.g.:
	/me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
will come out:
	*shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat):
http://www.irchelp.org/

* Upcoming EOWG meeting schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

###






 


-- 
DISCLAIMER:

NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is 
confidential and may be privileged.  If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the 
content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the 
sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it 
and any attachments from your system.

RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by
its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants.  However, it 
cannot accept any responsibility for any  such which are transmitted.
We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.

Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and 
any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RNIB.

RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227

Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk



This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - www.blackspider.com

Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2007 10:22:28 UTC