W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > January to March 2007

Regrets: EOWG: Agenda for 5 January 2007 Teleconference

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 14:02:17 +0100
Message-ID: <459E4C59.9070902@technosite.es>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

I can't attend this week.



Alan Chuter
Accessibility Consultant
Technosite (formerly Fundosa Teleservicios)
achuter@technosite.es
www.technosite.es
Tel. +34 91 121 03 35


Shawn Henry escribió:
> 
> Dear EOWG Participants:
> 
> An agenda and calling logistics for our 5 January 2007 teleconference 
> follow.
> 
> Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
>            http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
> Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
> 
> Agenda:
> 
> 1. Face-to-face meeting registration closes *Wednesday* 10 January
> 
> If you plan to attend the EOWG f2f 22-23 January in Boston (Cambridge), 
> please register through the "Registration for W3C Multi-Group Meetings" 
> page at:
> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/1/MGM07req/
> 
> 2. Scribe planning
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2007JanMar/0000.html
> 
> 3. ATAG 2.0 Working Draft review
> 
> Documents:
> * ATAG Overview: http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/atag.php
> * ATAG Working Draft: http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/
> 
> Background:
> * Call for Review e-mail: 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ig/2006OctDec/0292.html
> 
> Focus for EOWG review and discussion:
> NOTE: The list below includes new questions since the EOWG review e-mail 
> in December.
> 
> a. How well does the ATAG Overview introduce ATAG? Please review the 
> Overview first as a "front door" preview before you read ATAG. Then, go 
> back to the Overview after having read ATAG.
> b. Is the ATAG 2.0 Working Draft understandable? Look especially at the 
> Abstract, Introduction, and Conformance sections.
> c. Are the guidelines and success criteria clear?
> d. Is the relationship between ATAG 2.0 and WCAG 1.0 and WCAG 2.0 clear?
> e. Is it clear that accessible (ATAG-compliant) authoring tools have a 
> crucial role in making the Web accessible?
> 
> Comments so far:
> - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2006OctDec/0112.html 
> (from Justin)
> - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-eo/2006OctDec/0113.html 
> (from Justin)
> 
> Please send comments to the list before the meeting as possible.
> 
> Regards,
> ~ Shawn & Judy
> 
> ===
> 
> IRC reminders and tips:
> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. 
> All substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just 
> in IRC).
> - to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, 
> type /me comment - e.g.:
> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> will come out:
> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
> 
> Teleconference information:
> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/
> 
> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
> 
> ###
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 5 January 2007 13:03:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:43 GMT