- From: Sylvie Duchateau <sylvie.duchateau@snv.jussieu.fr>
- Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:08:21 +0200
- To: shawn@w3.org, w3c-wai-eo@w3.org
Hello Shawn and all, I have just read the slides carefully and I will try to answer some of your questions below. >1. Components of Web Accessibility: A 10 Minute Tutorial [working title] > - Latest version: > http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all.htm >Questions for your review: > >a. Any additional comments overall: How is this version meeting the >requirements? Does it contain the right amount of content and detail? How >is the tone? I cannot say much about the tone and the requiremeent meeting, but there are some suggestions below. - Clearly identify what are the components of Web accessibility in a list, how many are they and which are they. - while reading from slide 7 on, I don't understand why "alt text example" has been chosen. Maybe a sentence should explain that text equivalent for images is important for the accessibility of a Web site and for that reason, the "alt text example" has been chosen to illustrate each slide. > >b. Any comments on edits from last week? Particularly: >- the first page/slide >- the new one 17 "Accessibility Support Example" Slide 17 is helpful. May be another slide could be added illustrating another situation. >c. How do we want to differentiate the Alt text example bullets? Some >options: >i. <code> alt: prototyped in 7 "Web Content with Alt Text" May be useful for people reading in text-only but not for others. And maybe only useful for people knowing HTML language. Not for newbies. >ii. <strong> alt text example: prototyped in 8 "Browsers Getting Web >Content" After asking one colleague, strong is the most obvious way of presenting alt text example. >iii. <em>(italic) alt text example: prototyped in 9 "Assistive >Technologies Getting Web Content" Not easy to read. I think I remember that some people can't stand reading italics. >iv. parenthesis around all: prototyped in 10 "Users Getting Web Content" Not helpful. >v. nothing: prototyped in 11 "Developers Creating Web Content" Would not help distinguishing the example. >vi. other? Combining strong and code? >d. What do we call this and others like it? >The last 2 weeks we came up with title ideas and agreed to think more >about it. We have tried: >- Components of Web Accessibility: A 10-Minute Tutorial >- Components of Web Accessibility: Mini-Tutorial >- Components of Web Accessibility: A Walk-Through >There is still some concern about "10 Minute Tutorial" as it may take some >people longer, especially some people with disabilities. Other ideas that >we have had are in the 15 & 22 Sept minutes linked to from ><http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self.html#refs > I'm not in favour of 10 minutes tutorial, as many people may need longer to read the slides as you already pointed out. If we don't find anything better I still prefer "mini tutorial". Regards Sylvie
Received on Thursday, 5 October 2006 15:03:00 UTC