W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2006

EOWG: Agenda for 15 September 2006 Teleconference

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:24:31 -0500
Message-ID: <450A9B7F.1000400@w3.org>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Dear EOWG Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 15 September 2006 teleconference follow.

Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
                http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html

Agenda:

1. Ingredients of Web Accessibility: A Walk-Through (working title)
   - Latest version:
        http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all-extended.htm
   - Requirements and changelog:
        http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self
   - Source document:
        http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/components

Note:
- These are rough drafts. I want to settle on the approach before refining the text and details.
- Images are also rough. I'll update them based on the approach we decide to take. 

Questions for discussion:

a. Finding a more friendly word than "Components"? Ingredients? Other?
a.i. Adding in "Essential"? "Integral"? Currently already have "vital" and "crucial" -- leave in or out?

b. In 9 Assistive Technologies Getting Web Content, is it useful to also include the "official" definition (already have informal one), or does it add more clutter than its worth?

c. In 13 Evaluation Tools in Making Web Content, should we add a note with links to Selecting Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools <http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/selectingtools.html> and/or Web Accessibility Evaluation Tools List Search <http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tools> (which includes a link to selecting? While it would be useful, we don't want to clutter this with too many links to other documents.

d. What about "usually" in: "Web content developers usually use authoring tools and evaluation tools to create Web content."? The sentence is simpler without it; however it's not true that all "Web content developers use... evaluation tools..." OK to leave "usually" out anyway? What about changing it to "Most Web content developers..."?

e. I suggest not calling these "slides" since they are intended for self-study and not presentation. How about calling them 
i. Step-Through Overview
ii. Walk-Through
iii. ? other ideas...

2. Attendance and regrets for upcoming weeks

3. Trends and Issues (if time and if items)
- Please send notes to the list before the meeting

Regards,
~ Shawn & Judy

===

IRC reminders and tips:
- IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All 
substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
- to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type 
/me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
will come out:
*shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/

* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

###
Received on Friday, 15 September 2006 12:24:45 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT