W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2006

EOWG: Reading and Questions this week before 15 September 2006 Teleconference

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:41:57 -0500
Message-ID: <45076FF5.5020606@w3.org>
To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Dear EOWG Participants:

Please review the following this week and send comments to the EOWG e-mailing list before the teleconference.

Self-Study "Slides" for Components of Web Accessibility

* Version A Rough Draft:
	http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all-extended.htm#(6)
Note that Version A:
- Includes alt text examples
- Has more coverage of the poor & good accessibility support, on 2 slides
- Puts the detailed descriptions on their own (6) slides

* Version B Rough Draft:
	http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all.htm
Note that Version B:
- Is very simple, without the alt text example
- Has less coverage of the poor & good accessibility support, on 1 slide
- Has only a few "slides" with "builds"

* Changelog and Requirements:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self

Note:
- These are rough drafts. I want to settle on the approach before refining the text and details.
- Images are also rough. I'll update them based on the approach we decide to take.

For review and comment:

1. Does the alt example help understand the concepts?  Or does it add unnecessary complication?

2. Should the detailed descriptions be grouped on the 2 slides (with builds) as in Version A, or separated on 6 slides, as in Version B?

3. How should the poor & good accessibility support be covered?

4. I suggest not calling these "slides" since they are intended for self-study and not presentation. How about calling them a:
a. Step-Through Overview
b. Walkthrough
c. ? other ideas... 

Best,
~ Shawn
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 02:42:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT