- From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:41:57 -0500
- To: "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Dear EOWG Participants: Please review the following this week and send comments to the EOWG e-mailing list before the teleconference. Self-Study "Slides" for Components of Web Accessibility * Version A Rough Draft: http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all-extended.htm#(6) Note that Version A: - Includes alt text examples - Has more coverage of the poor & good accessibility support, on 2 slides - Puts the detailed descriptions on their own (6) slides * Version B Rough Draft: http://www.w3.org/Talks/wai-components/all.htm Note that Version B: - Is very simple, without the alt text example - Has less coverage of the poor & good accessibility support, on 1 slide - Has only a few "slides" with "builds" * Changelog and Requirements: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-components-self Note: - These are rough drafts. I want to settle on the approach before refining the text and details. - Images are also rough. I'll update them based on the approach we decide to take. For review and comment: 1. Does the alt example help understand the concepts? Or does it add unnecessary complication? 2. Should the detailed descriptions be grouped on the 2 slides (with builds) as in Version A, or separated on 6 slides, as in Version B? 3. How should the poor & good accessibility support be covered? 4. I suggest not calling these "slides" since they are intended for self-study and not presentation. How about calling them a: a. Step-Through Overview b. Walkthrough c. ? other ideas... Best, ~ Shawn
Received on Wednesday, 13 September 2006 02:42:01 UTC