W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: SV: EOWG: Reading and Agenda for 11 August 2006 Teleconference

From: Alan Chuter <achuter@technosite.es>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 13:30:47 +0200
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.td0kxlzvzqgw0t@0104xpd.e-fti.com>

I must second Helle's comment about 101. I have a vague idea that it means  
an introduction, first year class or something, but no more. I think for  
most people outside the US it is meaningless.

Alan



En Wed, 09 Aug 2006 10:37:47 +0200, Helle Bjarnø <hbj@visinfo.dk> escribió:

>
> I have a few comments (hope you have not discussed this before as I've  
> been
> absent for a while)
> I think this is a very important document to people from other countries
> with maybe less knowledge of W3C/WAI.
> I appreciate not using the 101 in the title as it makes no sense in this
> part of the world (I’ve discussed with colleagues who translate books in
> technical and psychological subjects and they say: “never use 101 for
> introductions”).
> I think the section:
> Document stages to a W3C Recommendation should be moved up. Readers might
> not see it if they don’t want to know about getting involved they want to
> know about the process for a document to become a W3C recommendation. In  
> the
> introduction we talk about the process and then the first 2 sections  
> talks
> about the different types of documents and how to get involved. I suggest
> that we change the order (apologies if this has been addressed and  
> solved in
> the last calls)
> In the first part I have problems with the sentence:
> “This page, the Overview pages linked in the list above, and most of the
> other pages in the WAI Web site are WAI Resources.”
> I had to read it several times to understand especially the insert “the
> Overview pages linked in the list above” took me a long time to figure  
> out
> it is an example of WAI resources. Maybe it’s easier to understand if we
> just take it out: “This page, and most of the other pages in the WAI Web
> site are WAI Resources.” Maybe add it as an example at the end of the
> sentence?
> “This page, and most of the other pages in the WAI Web site are WAI
> Resources.” (As the Overview pages linked in the list above).
> In 2. Last Call Working Draft:… I would like to have a sentence about
> sending comments like in 1. Working Draft:… Comments received now are  
> most
> easily addressed. Maybe saying that comments are less easily addressed  
> but
> they can still be submitted.
> Cheers
> Helle
>
>
> Helle Bjarnø
> Visual Impairment Knowledge Centre
> Rymarksvej 1, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark
> Phone: +45 39 46 01 01
> fax: +45 39 61 94 14
> e-mail hbj@visinfo.dk
> Direct phone: +45 39 46 01 04
> www.visinfo.dk
> www.euroaccessibility.org
>
>
>
>
>> -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
>> Fra: w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org
>> [mailto:w3c-wai-eo-request@w3.org] På vegne af Shawn Henry
>> Sendt: 9. august 2006 05:36
>> Til: EOWG
>> Emne: EOWG: Reading and Agenda for 11 August 2006 Teleconference
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear EOWG Participants:
>>
>> An agenda and calling logistics for our 11 August 2006
>> teleconference follow.
>>
>> Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
>>              http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
>> Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
>> IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
>> Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html
>>
>> READING: Before the meeting, please read the links below,
>> especially under items 1 "Process 101", and be prepared to
>> discuss any issues you see.
>>
>> Agenda:
>>
>> 1. W3C Process Intro ("Process 101")
>>
>> * Review updated requirements analysis:
>>        http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process
>> Note the new section "What the Personas Have to Say About It" at:
>> 	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process#personas
>>
>> * Discuss revised ROUGH concept draft:
>>        http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process
>> - How is the overall approach? Is it more friendly? Is it too basic?
>> - How does this order work? Might you miss the Process Stages
>> if you think the beginning is too basic for you?
>> - Does it cover the right topics? Do we need to add anything?
>> Where can we cut back?
>> - What about the title? (A few other ideas at:
>> 	
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process.html#d2006-07-00 &
>> 	http://www.w3.org/2006/08/07-eow2-minutes.html )
>> Note: It's only a concept draft, the writing is not at all
>> refined yet.
>> fyi: Previous drafts are listed in the "References" section
>> of the changelog:
>> 	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process.html#refs
>>
>> 2. Transitioning from WCAG 1.0 to 2.0 Resource Suite
>>
>> * Discuss requirements analysis:
>> 	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-transition1to2
>>
>> Regards,
>> ~ Shawn
>>
>> ===
>>
>> IRC reminders and tips:
>> - IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not
>> have IRC. All
>> substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not
>> just in IRC).
>> - to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the
>> minutes, type
>> /me comment - e.g.:
>> /me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
>> will come out:
>> *shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
>>
>> Teleconference information:
>> - Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
>> - W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge:
>> http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
>> - Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
>> - A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat):
>> http://www.irchelp.org/
>>
>> * Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule:
>> http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings
>>
>> ###
>>
>>
>
>
>



-- 
Alan Chuter
Accessibility Consultant
Technosite (formerly Fundosa Teleservicios)
achuter@technosite.es
www.technosite.es
Tel. +34 91 121 03 35
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 11:31:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT