W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2006

EOWG: Reading and Agenda for 11 August 2006 Teleconference

From: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 22:35:53 -0500
Message-ID: <44D95819.3040001@w3.org>
To: EOWG <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Dear EOWG Participants:

An agenda and calling logistics for our 11 August 2006 teleconference follow.

Time:    8:30am - 10:30am U.S. Eastern Time. For other time zones see:
             http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meeting.html
Bridge:  +1.617.761.6200, code: EOWG# (3694#)
IRC:     Channel: #eo, server: irc.w3.org, port: 6665
Scribe:  See http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/scribes.html

READING: Before the meeting, please read the links below, especially under items 1 "Process 101", and be prepared to discuss any issues you see.

Agenda:

1. W3C Process Intro ("Process 101")

* Review updated requirements analysis:
       http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process
Note the new section "What the Personas Have to Say About It" at:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process#personas

* Discuss revised ROUGH concept draft:
       http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/w3c-process
- How is the overall approach? Is it more friendly? Is it too basic?
- How does this order work? Might you miss the Process Stages if you think the beginning is too basic for you?
- Does it cover the right topics? Do we need to add anything? Where can we cut back?
- What about the title? (A few other ideas at:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process.html#d2006-07-00 &
	http://www.w3.org/2006/08/07-eow2-minutes.html )
Note: It's only a concept draft, the writing is not at all refined yet.
fyi: Previous drafts are listed in the "References" section of the changelog:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-process.html#refs

2. Transitioning from WCAG 1.0 to 2.0 Resource Suite

* Discuss requirements analysis:
	http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/changelogs/cl-transition1to2

Regards,
~ Shawn

===

IRC reminders and tips:
- IRC is supplemental to the call. Some participants do not have IRC. All 
substantive comments should be said verbally in the call (not just in IRC).
- to type a side comment that will _not_ get recorded in the minutes, type 
/me comment - e.g.:
/me hopes everyone had pleasant holidays
will come out:
*shawn hopes everyone had pleasant holidays

Teleconference information:
- Managing IRC for EOWG meeting minutes: 
http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/2003/template.html
- W3C Zakim Teleconference Bridge: http://www.w3.org/2002/01/UsingZakim
- Zakim IRC Bot: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot
- A source for help with IRC (Internet Relay Chat): http://www.irchelp.org/

* Upcoming EOWG teleconference schedule: http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/#meetings

###
Received on Wednesday, 9 August 2006 03:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT