W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-eo@w3.org > July to September 2006

Re: W3C Process Intro ("Process 101") (was EOWG: Agenda for 4 August 2006 Teleconference)

From: Pasquale Popolizio <pasquale@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 18:00:58 +0200
Message-Id: <3F70BD54-44E4-4206-A264-09DA312BC43E@osservatoriosullacomunicazione.com>
To: Shawn Henry <shawn@w3.org>, "EOWG (E-mail)" <w3c-wai-eo@w3.org>

Hi Shawn, hi all.
I agree with you; this document should be short.
I think it's not important to include reference about "Notes".

regards
ciao

~ pasquale








Il giorno 02/ago/06, alle ore 16:21, Shawn Henry ha scritto:

>
> My quick reactions:
> - We want to keep this doc as short and focused as possible.
>
> - *Why* W3C uses "Recommendation" rather than "standard" I think is  
> out of scope. However, making it clear that W3C Recommendation =  
> standard I think is in scope to cover efficiently -- that is, not  
> have a long paragraph explaining it, but just something like: "W3C  
> Recommendation (Standard): ... W3C Recommendations are similar to  
> the standards published by other organizations."
>
> - I think we probably should include something about Notes;  
> however, I'm a little concerned about expanding the document.
> EOWG, Comments?
> Best,
> ~Shawn
Received on Wednesday, 2 August 2006 16:01:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 10:33:42 GMT